Our Man In “Beirut”—A Feature Film Review

Beyond the Marvel Studios and DC Films superhero and raunchy animation and comedic franchise film universe that appears to be more constructed and comforting to adults than children, liberal Hollywood still finds time to slot in genre dramatic films that seem more inspired by conscience and adventure than financial gain. Thank goodness. Certainly, box-office ambition didn’t inspire independent production house Radar Pictures to deliver Beirut to multiplexes where audiences are too distracted or honed in on seeing the latest and the greatest; I’m sure as well popular former TV mad man Jon Hamm was cast to star for his dramatic abilities, not so much for his box–office mojo, and that would go for costar Rosamund Pike, who’s established herself as one of the premier actresses currently working, as well. But here we have it, another in a fairly long line of genre films featuring independent, no-nonsense agents and adventurous journalists mixing it up in foreign lands often uprooted by civil strife settling scores when their bosses and/or representative bureaucracies are too corrupt, self-interested, incompetent, or all three, to do it themselves. Hamm steps in for the likes of Audie Murphy, Alec Guinness, Jean-Louis Trintignant, Jack Lemmon, Mel Gibson, Sam Waterston, Richard Woods, and Pierce Brosnan; Beirut for Saigon, Havana, Athens, Santiago, Jakarta, Phnom Penh, San Salvador, and Panama City. Things are going to hell, everywhere, and all the time, and somebody’s go to do it.

The engaging, well-cast Hamm proves himself to be well up to the task, as do Academy Award–nominated screenwriter Tony Gilroy (Michael Clayton) and director Brad Anderson (Transsiberian). Anderson is more attuned to the horror genre (Stonehearst Asylum; Vanishing on 7th Street; the gritty, memorable Session 9) as well as the excellent industrial nightmare The Machinist. He went rather mainstream with the Halle Berry starring The Call, but nothing could anticipate his utter mastery of the political thriller genre here; for sure, you wouldn’t be surprised if you were told this had been made by a younger Ridley Scott. This is, however, not Gilroy’s first rodeo in the genre, and that could’ve helped guide the director’s unseen hand. In addition to …Clayton, Gilroy’s penned State of Play, Proof of Life, and the Bourne franchise. Beirut could be a text in a genre seminar: it’s fluid with tough-talking genre dialogue and matter-of-fact metaphoric language; romantic allusion; determined, shifty characters with intense countenances; reckless action and merciless explosions; and destabilizing plot twists. There is an absolutely terrific cryptic interrogation scene involving Hamm’s character and a former colleague. The film offers nothing new, nothing new at all; nor does it seek to.

That does not mean the genre doesn’t have any pitfalls; most do. There may be a tendency in these films, however well-intentioned, to exploit the foreign locales in which the action is occurring, places and peoples that have likely already seen a fair degree of exploitation. Beirut is not an exception; in fact, it tips its hand early on, in the prologue, in compromised U.S. diplomat Mason Skiles (Hamm) welcoming narration. The capital city is, of course, a mess, with entrenched, centuries-old rivalries contributing to age-old anxieties and dangerous uncertainties that are intensified with the entry and emergence of the PLO and the landless Palestinians. It’s the early 1970s, and it’s not a place the sitting American president would want people streaming over the border from. While there is the typical depiction of local flavor, it’s not always of the best the city has to offer, and there is little mention of the city’s prolific artistic and cultural contributions either in front of or right along with the conditions that afflict most all urban centers, war-torn or not. Indeed, by the time our man returns a decade later to give a lecture on mediation at the American University, hmm-hmm, after a hasty retreat subsequent to personal tragedy, the place has succumbed to full-blown civil war.

The visiting lecturer doesn’t have to look to far witness the descent of a cradle of civilization at the hand of its agents from Israel, whom the film authoritatively asserts wears the pants not only in the region, but vis-à-vis the United States and its liaisons as well; Syria; and parties within. The city lies in ruins, rubble and detritus lie where buildings once stood, people are tense and on edge, and a Green Line separates Muslims and Christians. At one point, Mason takes Embassy attaché Ms. Crowder (Pike) on a diverting tour of the opulent former residence he shared with his Lebanese wife, Nadia (radiant French actress Leïla Bekhti, Leila, A Prophet), and their adopted son, Karim (French actor Idir Chender, Carbone), only to see it in complete ruin. It’s a metaphor for his own life, of course. The former Embassy point man turned labor negotiator turned downwardly mobile self-employed alcoholic has a reckoning; seems he’s also in town to conduct a crucial mediation of his own. Soon, personal danger mixes with personal trepidation; it’s fight or flight, and we’ll come to see just how good a man our man really is. Hamm and Pike are surrounded by a seasoned ensemble cabal that seems particularly suited to this kind of heart-pounding, gut-wrenching cinematic endeavor: Mark Pelligrino (The Trials of Cate McCall) as Mason’s longtime coconspirator and best friend, Cal; a toupeed Dean Norris (Death Wish, The Book of Henry) and an excellent Shea Whigham (Kong: Skull Island, Term Life) as untrustworthy field agents Gaines and Ruzak; Larry Pine (Freak Show, Buried Child) as the all-knowing U.S. ambassador; brilliant Londoner Jonny Coyne (Monster, Nightcrawler) as Mason’s personal handler; and prolific Israeli actor Alon Aboutboul (Harmonia, London Has Fallen) as a critical Mossad station chief.

The film’s final image is of an American flag flying against a setting sun shot from the roof of the U.S. embassy. At first, I was stunned, taking it for a closing propaganda device, believing an executive producer or someone must’ve been on a two-way radio with the White House. Soon enough, it dawned on me that was not the case at all—the filmmakers’ intent—not necessarily the two-way communications. The events that inspired this film, and like films before it, are still being visited upon us. Despite a heavy U.S. executive and military communications and logistics blackout that substitutes terse statements, deception, and daily disinformation, these events are still being reported by adventurous journalists and published in media all around us, all the time. They become stories to be told, winding up in books, in films, and ever more frequently, on television. If they weren’t, people wouldn’t need to write, create, or produce them, and we wouldn’t need to read nor see them. If there is a direct correlation between the setting sun of U.S. foreign intervention—especially in this besieged region—and the rise of the comic-book superhero and raunchy cartoon and comedic franchises that citizens are eager or drawn to engage in, whether they’re aware of it or not, films like Beirut are striving to achieve some sort of balance. There will always be an individual, with or without a sidekick and a love interest, compelled to make a difference, and, most likely, filmmakers like Tony Gilroy and Radar Pictures to interpret their story. They’ll just be thankful Chinua Achebe isn’t around to deconstruct it.

(The sun is setting, somewhere. Beirut continues in general theatrical release.)

© 2018 John Tyler/24 Hours

Advertisements

“Acrimony”: Thy Name Is Tears—A Feature Film Review

While it’s Taraji Henson’s scorned face staring back at you, Medusa-like, in the poster for the latest all-American, melodramatic thriller in which she stars, make no mistake about it, it’s the writer-director-producer’s unseen hand that’s all over it, and the film, Acrimony, is his, and his alone. That doesn’t mean the engaged, dynamic Henson, who’s already distinguished herself this year as Proud Mary, doesn’t make her presence known, but from the filmmaker’s responsive screenplay, to his fluid, assured direction, to his astute handling of another nice, primarily African-American cast, it’s a master class, and despite it’s rotten score by the arbitrators at the popular cinema site, it’s genre filmmaking that rises to the level of, uh-hum, greatness, dare I say.

For sure, Acrimony bears all the trademarks of Tyler Perry’s dramatic kit—flashy production values; beautiful people with their beautiful faces and beautiful bodies; overdramatized hijinks; romantic liaisons and disgraceful betrayals; playful dialogue and social innuendo—but the more outrageous and exaggerated effects he is known to employ are, uh-hum, toned down, or so well-established and stylishly conveyed they resemble Polanski and Hitchcock, I dare say. Indeed, if another filmmaker had made this film 60 years ago with, say, Bette Davis or Joan Crawford, critics and audiences might’ve been enthralled. Frank Capra could’ve appreciated its tables-turning plot subversion; John Huston its beautiful, startling, red-tinged climax; Hitch himself its tense, stylish obsession. For better or worse, I imagine, this could be the filmmaker’s Vertigo. It’s essentially the consummate work in the Tyler Perry dramatic canon, a consummation of his career so far, sans Madea.

It could also be a submission in his own Dekalog. Like Kieslowski’s take on classical moral and ethical dilemmas played out in modern Eastern-European scenes of conflict and drenching turmoil, Perry’s romantic dramas have always seemed biblical in inspiration and nature; in fact, they wear scripture on their sleeves, and the former church-going youth’s latest is no different. The film is divided into chapters, I suppose, introduced by garish words like “Acrimony” and “Torment” with their definitions and synonyms that flash across the screen like signposts signaling the psychological progression of the affected protagonist. Indeed, the story is framed by Henson’s Melinda’s initial court-ordered therapy visit in which she appears in such flagrant and bellicose self-delusion she comes across like an alternately lucid and deranged character straight out of Poe; it only becomes more tragic from there. The framing device too casually takes us to Melinda’s formative years, and what ensues is so nicely portrayed we can forgive Perry a casual moment or two.

Stubborn, struggling college student Melinda (Ajiona Alexus, 13 Reasons Why, Bad Girl) rather abruptly meets gifted fellow student and Nina Simone–aficionado Robert (Antonio Madison, The Tailor’s Apprentice), who offers to help her with, what else, a paper. Their portentous meeting is one for the stars; Melinda soon realizes the engaging young man with the dark skin she’s been resisting is the love of her life, much to the dismay of her bossy sister, Brenda (Bresha Webb, Meet the Blacks, Ride Along 2). Here, Perry delivers some of the film’s most thoughtful moments in scenes of the young couple’s romantic tenderness. The screenwriter displays a nuance for the language and conventions of young people, pointing to what could be a most satisfying film that strays from his typical preoccupation with thirty and fortysomethings. The radiant Alexus, in particular, proves so serenely engaging that it is disappointing to leave this place; she certainly seems to have a promising career ahead of her, including playing Gabrielle Union’s daughter in the upcoming Breaking In. Perry does a nice job interweaving Henson’s biting narration with the flashback scenes, which are often in tonal contrast. The young lovers with the star-crossed dreams soon embrace calamity; the narrator’s lamentations become more acidic, and what ensues is flat-out Greek tragedy. The framework of the in-your-throat plot—three young sisters lose the matriarch of a matriarchy then watch as their inheritance and family home progressively dissolve on a pipe dream—which the director reckons with onscreen textural elements—could’ve been written by Lorraine Hansbury. The setting is Pittsburgh; one wonders how much August Wilson was on the filmmaker’s mind as well.

Perry has assembled quite a sterling production team at his vast Atlanta studio complex. There are too many names to mention for this one, but Paul Wonsek’s sleek production design, Richard Vialet’s fluid cinematography, and Kim Coleman (Almost Christmas, Chi-Raq) and Rhayvinn Drummer’s (The Single Moms Club) casting certainly stand out. Among their finds were prolific television acting costar Lyriq Bent (Love Jacked, Pay the Ghost) as the adult Robert, the nice Chrystle Stewart as Robert’s pivotal former college flame Diana, and Ptosha Storey as the adult Brenda. The soundtrack from Christopher Lennertz is a tour de force of the genre, and features a number of original songs, including several by Simone as well as a new interpretation performed by Grammy-nominated R&B singer-songwriter Andra Day. If you’re not generally a fan of the much-admired, and much-maligned, filmmaker’s canon, this one is not likely to change your mind, but who knows? If you do happen to see it, don’t let the confused, embarrassed audience hysterics affect you, just let yourself go. Acrimony is a beautifully done work by a primary American filmmaker who’s struck silver just by doing what he loves to do best.

(Polanski, Hitchcock, Capra, Huston, Kieslowski, Poe, Aristotle, Lorraine Hansbury, August Wilson, Tyler Perry… hmm. Call me crazy, or you be the judge, if you haven’t already… Acrimony continues in general theatrical release.)

© 2018 John Tyler/24 Hours

Is It Me? 2017 Film Award Favorites—International/Foreign Language—Prologue

The year got off to a slow start even in the international scene, though things erupted with a bang! so to speak, with the release of Olivier Assayas’ Personal Shopper in early March. I’m speaking of the blackout ending, of course, perhaps the most satisfying moment of the year. The film is a reunion of the stylish French filmmaker—who tied for Best Director at Cannes in 2016 for it—and Kristen Stewart, following Clouds of Sils Maria, and, as such, marks the difficulties in delineating what precisely is a foreign-international or English-language production. I put Assayas’ film in the former category because, although just one of several international filmmakers who’s reached out to American and English-speaking stars, he’s so indelibly linked to the French film industry and …Shopper was, typically for him, internationally financed. Though marred somewhat by a lurid melodramatic murder subplot that reminds one of his international intrigue thrillers from the previous decade, Demonlover and Boarding Gate, who can resist a good ghost story, especially one involving twin siblings? Bang!

Speaking of …Sils Maria, Juliette Binoche arrived the following month alongside personal fave Fabrice Luchini in the deliberately outrageous Ma Loute—drably renamed Slack Bay here—from another film stylist, Bruno Dumont. The colorful, absurdist hijinks along the scenic seashore barely mask an unsavory undercurrent to the disgusting, dissolute display by the one percent, and sure enough, the stark subversion of class distinction and privilege breaks through but never totally obscures the fun, which includes satiric scenes of classic cinematic eroticism involving the young lower-class lovers (Brandon Lavieville, Raph). Dumont does a nice job mixing and juxtaposing the all-star and totally unproven cast to great effect, also getting great mileage with the always popular satire of the French police throughout. Cahiers du cinéma named the film the fifth best of the year, which, lo, is right where I have it.

In addition to The Zookeeper’s Wife, the Holocaust remains the cinematic gift that keeps on giving. Celebrated Israeli filmmaker Avi Nesher brought together two excellent young actresses, Joy Rieger and Nelly Tagar, to play modern sisters literally slapped from complacency into looking into their father’s (Doran Tavory, the steely invasive Israel defense minister in Lemon Tree) murky past in Past Life. This is a genre favorite, and you just know what they’ll find—or do you? Arriving in November and blowing most all of the competition away, Hungarian filmmaker Ferenc Török’s beautifully done 1945 summons an astonishing, in-your-face act of redemption as if from a predawn séance through the solemn and dignified arrival of two Jewish outsiders (Iván Angelusz, Marcell Nagy) into a small, postwar, Russian-occupied Hungarian village of self-interested, eccentric conspirators. Shot in B&W with slow tracking shots and odd angles and like a 1940s Henri-Georges Clouzot French noir or a midcentury western, every gesture and movement in this expertly crafted piece of expressionism counts. Drenched in irony and symbolism, the film comes full circle with the strangers exit with billowing smoke from the locomotive evoking scenes of the final journey from a nation that under Germany in years just previous took the lead in outsourcing its peoples to Auschwitz.

More a post–WWI romance than an examination of the origins of the next European conflagration, another intruder’s (an excellent Pierre Niney, A Perfect Man, Yves Saint Laurent) murky identity nonetheless plays a large part in his acceptance or no at the hands of a German couple and their daughter (Paula Beer) grieving their lost son and brother and more amid rising nationalist tension in François Ozon’s period mood piece Frantz. German director Oliver Hirschbiegel (Downfall, Das Experiment) has dedicated much of his feature film professional career wrestling with his country’s notorious past and arrived with another such depiction, 13 Minutes, involving the compelling reenactment of a nearly successful assassination on the Fürher early on by an inspired musician-turned resistance fighter (Christian Friedell, Amour FouThe White Ribbon) unnerved by his country’s takeover by a wave of Nazism, intolerance, and industrial militarism. Hirschbiegel takes a typically direct and professional approach to the daring November 1939 event, which, after all, if successful, could’ve prevented the deaths of some 55 million people, including some 6 million European Jews, reminding one that if all is fatalism, there is still much left to chaos and chance. Still, there are moments of idyll in the plot’s progression, and in Georg Elser’s sometimes unhinged derangement one is reminded of Sean Penn’s Samuel Bicke in the underappreciated 2004 film The Assassination of Richard Nixon. Nixon may not have been quite as prolific as Adolf Hitler, but he and war-crimes cohort Heinz Alfred Kissinger did pave the way for the torture and disappearance of more than 40,000 Chileans under Augusto Pinochet and in what the Vietnamese call the American War, estimates of 1965-74 deaths—Nixon assumed the presidency in ‘68—range from University of Massachusetts Amherst professor emeritus Guenter Lewy’s prescaled 1.35 million to The BMJ’s 1.7 million—with The BMJ’s 3.1 million to 3.4 to more than 4 million from the Socialist Republic itself for the entire affair. Too bad, really, but, as you know, heroism is not always defined by success. Just look at the movies.

One would like to think such holocausts—hydrogen cyanide–saturated labor camp showers and the suffusive aerial strafing of an entire nation with napalm—were over, or that these people didn’t die all in vain. Besides Past Life, another Israeli film, Foxtrot, arrived here late that I was fortunate to see presented by its director, Samuel Maoz (Lebanon), at AFI Fest in Hollywood in November. Sweeping several Awards of the Israeli Film Academy—including Best Picture, Best Director, and Best Actor—winner of the Silver Lion Grand Jury Prize at Venice, and the National Board of Review’s Best Foreign Language Film, the avant-garde, often absurdist, Kubrickesque antiwar film contains perhaps the most indelible image of the year: that of an occupied car being completely buried under, and bulldozed over, the land adjacent to an Israeli checkpoint. A war veteran—who isn’t in Israel?—Moaz presents a repressed architect, husband, and father (Lior Ashkenazi, Norman, Yitzhak Rabin in 7 Days in Entebbe) crumbling under the weight of his responsibilities amid the aftereffects of a tragedy involving his son (Yonaton Shiray, A Tale of Love and Darkness), whose checkpoint posting with his peers accounts for the Kubrickesque. American armchair conservatives, none of whom appeared to be in attendance amid the modest faithful at the afternoon screening, may be surprised—or maybe they just don’t care—at the toll the Palestinian occupation is taking on the psyches of those wearing, and who have worn, the boots on the ground. All this, and the film didn’t even make my top ten.

Neither did Loveless, another celebrated film from Russian director Andrey Zvyaginstev (Leviathan), a solid, creative effort artistically shot by cinematographer Mikhail Krichman and well-acted by principals Aleksey Rozin, Maryana Spivak, and Matvey Novikov, who’s gone early but gets in a few appropriately surly and sullen scenes. The film shines a light on the frightful circumstances of Russian runaways and deliciously skewers the aspiring bourgeoisie, who appear to have lost themselves in their smartphones—who hasn’t?—with Spivak’s Zhenya’s shockingly brusque attitude toward her on-the-outs husband and neglected son tempered by self-centered selfies and such, as if when she looks upon the glass of her phone it is as if she were Narcissus looking into a gleaming pool. Karl Marx would certainly be spinning in his grave upon a viewing—who knew an opiate of the masses would be so cool and sensational?—but then again, they’ve been used by the voiceless from Iran to Egypt to recent protests by American schoolchildren to light the fires of revolution.

Standout actress Bérénice Bejo is equally severe—how could she be otherwise?—in After Love, a French-Belgian production you probably didn’t see but perhaps may’ve liked to. I saw the film at AFI Fest the previous November. It was in Santa Monica for a week in August, a cruel inequity for a more vibrant depiction of a deeply estranged couple with children present that recalls the power of Kramer vs. Kramer. It’s certainly one of the best of its kind in the subgenre since, and one I think Americans would appreciate. After Love flows with the rhythms of life so typical of French films; it becomes a study in domestic repair when the estranged couple must endure the finality of their uncomfortable relations together due to the husband’s (terrific French triple-threat Cédric Khan) ill fortune. Bejo’s luminous forbidding gaze softens a bit—the witch of all domestic witches, and yet who wouldn’t want to be under her spell?—and as if the drama wasn’t enough, the couple’s warmer moments with their children deliver a reward that the lost Russians of Loveless just can’t.

Speaking of Russia, and its former occupation of Hungary, two films arrived that took place in adjacent former satellite states Czechoslovakia and Poland; one was, IMO, the international film of the year. In Jan Hrebejk’s (Divided We Fall) The Teacher, which takes place in Czechoslovakia in the early 1980s pre–Velvet Revolution, the petty favoritism and manipulative, unscrupulous self-interest of “Comrade Teacher” Mária Drazdechová (a nice Zuzana Mauréry) serve as a glass reflection of the punitive, corrupt socialist state at large. The story is framed by an administrative meeting called to give semideluded, played-upon parents a voice in the teacher’s potential transfer, as if she were an abusive priest, once the jig is up: the return of favors for the children of parents who reward her and scoldings and downwardly adjusted grades for those whose don’t. The meeting plays out like a heated episode of season one of HBO’s Big Little Lies; though the emergence of an abusive father (sleeping giant Martin Havelka, who needs to be discovered by Aki Kaurismäki) of a delinquent son (Oliver Oswald) into her romantic sphere is surprising. The film, despite its sometimes intense exchanges, plays in a light, ironic sheen overall, and while mediocrity is indeed rewarded in such totalitarian societies—nevermind the organized bullying of noncompliant actors—it’s been known to in democracies as well.

The film is a jewel to Los Angeles Times critic Kenneth Turan, and it’s one Polish avant-garde constructivist artist Wladystaw Stremiński might’ve appreciated as well. Stremiński is the subject of the iconic Andrej Wajda’s (Walesa, Tatarak, Katyn) stirring, invigorating swan song, Afterimage, which depicts a similar society post–­WWII in more drastic and desperate tones. The film begins with a pastoral scene of Stremiński (the drastically underappreciated Boguslaw Linda—his only recognition outside Poland for the film was a fifth-place Best Actor finish at the Seattle International Film Festival—in a performance for a lifetime) and his loyal, dedicated art students that might not have been out of place in The Sound of Music and ends in utter horror. Stremiński’s penetrating and popular lectures on vision theory at the State Higher School of the Visual Arts in Lodz are just beginning to stir the free-thinking youth when Minister of Culture and Art Wlodzimierz Sokorski (Szymon Bobrowski) stomps in to put a damper on them. Stremiński’s objections to demands that the visual arts school service communist ideology eventually cost him his teaching position; his party papers soon follow, exiling him from virtually everything, to the point where he cant even purchase paints at the party-owned co-op. The proud artist, whose own works are purged from the modern and contemporary Museum of Art in Lodz and his person erased from history, advises his concerned, outraged students that the “wind of history” will soon pass, but he miscalculates the storm that’s enveloping him. His plight is in part self-inflicted, and not just because he dared take a stand, which can mean personal ruin in just about any society at any time. A multiple amputee who lives on a steady diet of work, cigarettes, and the absence of sunlight, he rejects his estranged daughter’s (Bronislawa Zamachowska) entreaties to assist, and otherwise treats the runaway a little shabbily. For the consumed painter, it’s indeed pride before the fall; after fighting for food stamps, he soon rejects those as well. Wajda lets the audience decide for themselves about the man, whose quiet, dignified reserve and relaxed, assured cadence and demeanor can’t bear the weight of history. Whatever you decide, his devastating descent seems tailor-made for anti-communist Americans, though it, and the film itself, a gripping tearjerker, is one for the ages. The Academy missed a final chance to honor Wajda, who won an Honorary Oscar for five decades of extraordinary film direction in 2000—his first film, A Generation, about Polish youth coming of age during the German socialist occupation, came out in 1955. He perished at 90 just a month prior to Afterimage’s premier at the Toronto International Film Festival. You couldn’t write a more perfect script, but I understand A Fantastic Woman was all the rage, and old white European men are passé.

Speaking of Russia and film, it’s hard not to get around Andrei Tarkovsky these days. Criterion is in the midst of remastering his work for both theatrical and home-video release, and the May limited release—I saw it the Laemmle Royal in West Los Angeles—of Stalker, his absolutely mesmerizing 1979 dystopian sci-fi masterwork, was, IMO, the film event of the year. The new 2K digital restoration further crystallizes its entrancing aural and visual delights: an industrial symphony of dripping water on pans, creaking wood floors, broken glass, positively transfixing extended slow-pan close-ups of cast-aside religious relics and iconography submerged under shimmering water. Masterful scene setup and shots, sound design, atmospherics—it’s arthouse cinema to the nth degree. The terra firma sci-fi—ruined cars, strewn streets, poisoned water, industrial decay, a woman’s (Alisa Freyndlikh) breakdown, its hopeless, radioactive apocalypse a premonition of Chernobyl—evoke Lars von Trier’s early The Element of Crime, which would come five years later. The Stalker (Alexsandr Kaydanovskiy) at the center lives life on the edge, toiling for himself and his family, a distressed common soul with a wolf-like connection to a stray dog he’ll adopt, a proletarian model to the loquacious idleness of Pisatel, the writer (Anatolly Solonitsyn), and the Professor (Nikolay Grinko) waist-deep in the mud of their own absurdity. The film is quite dialogue-drenched in the metaphysical and existential, with its hopeless search for meaning amid ruin, and Pisatel can be a real turnoff, but its rewards are too stunning to ignore. If the climax collapses into utter uselessness, as if into a black hole, the finale is riveting, its final image a searing indictment not only of the bourgeoise intelligentsia, but of the military and bureaucracy of a government of a stifling society devoid of spirituality and mysticism that thoughtlessly leaves its children and next generations to suffer the oppressive consequences. It dawned on me what a loss it is to lose Tarkovsky at such a relatively young age—he was 54 when he perished in exile from lung cancer, likely attributable to damage he sustained filming Stalkerin a poisoned industrial setting on a drawn-out shoot. If critics fawned over Loveless, it just can’t touch a film like Stalker, and this is the legacy we miss.

I typically don’t fret with animated films when doing a top ten—I don’t see many anyway and they’re not truly feature films, but two absolutely phenomenal such films arrived from foreign shores that just could not be ignored. Loving Vincent, from writer-directors Dorota Kobiela and Hugh Welchman, who should receive free lifetime memberships to the Louvre, is an innovative creative gift to fans of Vincent van Gogh—who are basically all of us. Animation is achieved, appropriately enough, through painterly effect—painted frame after painted frame after painted frame in the artist’s swirling, effusive, color-burst late-period style suffused over the actors’ scenes and into the backgrounds. If that’s not enough, the well-researched screenplay is a much-appreciated examination of the artist’s final days in Auvers, dramatically depicting one of the most unbearably wretched sagas in the annals of art history, which has seen many. If it isn’t bad enough we lost Tarkovsky too early, losing van Gogh in his prime, especially in this sordid fashion, is deeply depressing. Of course. back then, the Impressionism star whose more renowned paintings fetch nine figures was a nobody, really, an outcast of not only the Parisian art scene but of humanity itself, and this film is an ode to a sympathetic man who deserved better. The pathetically ordinary, but still extra…, plot commences when a postmaster’s (Chris O’Dowd, The Cloverfield Paradox, Molly’s Game) son, Armand Roulin (a nice Douglas Booth, The Dirt, Mary Shelley) reluctantly agrees to deliver a dead letter from Vincent to brother Theo, only to find himself sucked into the artist’s confounding demise himself to the point of attachment. The animation features an excellent supportive cast of English actors, including Eleanor Tomlinson (Colette, Poldark) as hotel proprietress Adeline Ravoux, personal fave Jerome Flynn (Game of Thrones, Ripper Street) as Dr. Gachet, and Helen McCrory (Their FinestPenny Dreadful) as Gachet’s bitter housekeeper Louise Chevalier; it-girl Saoirse Ronan also appears as Gachet’s unsympathetic daughter, Marguerite. It’s a colorful case Agatha Christie’s Hercule Poirot would’ve enjoyed, and you should too. The Breadwinner, meanwhile, from Irish animation filmmaker Nora Twomey (Song of the Sea, The Secret of Kells) is a true animation, and one of the most artistically aspirational films you’ll see. Written by writer-director Anita Doran (The End of Silence) from the children’s book by Canadian author/activist Deborah Ellis, the screenplay is a paean to the Afghan storytelling tradition, with 11-year-old heroine Parvana (Saraa Chaudry) not only rising up to rescue her Taliban-abducted father (Ali Badshah) from under the cloak of oppression, but also undergoing a mythical journey of her own. The film itself is a dynamic expression of Afghan culture, and the film’s audio-visual artistry a nice recompense for a people who have endured and experienced too much. It too has an excellent cast, from veteran television guest-star Laara Sadiq as Parvana’s mother, Fatana; Shaista Latif as her sister, Soraya; Kawa Ada as market benefactor/protector Razaq; Soma Chhaya as co-conspirator Shauzia; and Noorin Gulamgaus as Taliban bad-boy Idrees. Considering this country and culture has inextricably been linked to our own for the past three decades or so, with our military presence there going well into its second, this is a film every American should see, and take their children to see; the least we can do for this besieged nation is to see a 95-minute cartoon celebrating its culture and people. I unfortunately missed an afternoon family outing to see Coco, but it must have been something else to beat these two films to an Animated Feature Film Academy Award. After all, beauty is in the eye of the beholder and this, in 2017, is what I beheld.

(This post continues below with my 2017 international/foreign language film award favorites.)

© 2018 John Tyler/24 Hours

Is It Me? 2017 Film Award Favorites—International/Foreign Language—Awards

International/Foreign Language Film Awards

(Winners in bold.)

 Film of the Year

 Personal Shopper

Slack Bay

Afterimage

1945

In the Fade

Filmmaker of the Year (Writer-Director)

Olivier Assayas (Personal Shopper)

Bruno Dumont (Slack Bay)

Avi Nesher (Past Life)

Ferenc Török (1945)

Fatih Akin (In the Fade)

Stand-Alone Director of the Year

Andrej Wajda (Afterimage)

Best Screenplay

Olivier Assayas (Personal Shopper)

Bruno Dumont (Slack Bay)

Andrzej Mularczyk (Afterimage)

Fanny Burdino, Mazarine Pingeot, Joachim Lafosse (After Love)

Dorota Kobiela, Hugh Welchman (Loving Vincent)

Best Adapted Screenplay

François Ozon, Phillippe Piazzo (Frantz)

Avi Nesher (Past Life)

Ferenc Török, Gábor T. Szántó (1945)

Anita Doran (The Breadwinner)

Fatih Akin (In the Fade)

 

Male Performance of the Year 

Pierre Niney (Frantz)

Fabrice Luchini (Slack Bay)

Boguslaw Linda (Afterimage)

Cédric Khan (After Love)

Lior Ashkenazi (Foxtrot) 

Female Performance of the Year

Kristen Stewart (Personal Shopper)

Juliette Binoche (Slack Bay)

Joy Rieger (Past Life)

Bérénice Bejo (After Love)

Diane Kruger (In the Fade)

The Two Catherines Onscreen Chemistry Award

Catherine Frot, Catherine Deneuve (The Midwife) 

Male Supporting Performance

Thierry Lavieville (Slack Bay)

Martin Havelka (The Teacher)

Iván Angelusz (1945)

Norman Acar (In the Fade)

Johannes Krisch (In the Fade) 

Female Supporting Performance

Zofia Wichlacz (Afterimage)

Evgenia Dodina (Past Life)

Nelly Tagar (Past Life)

Sarah Adler (Foxtrot)

Dóra Sztarenki (1945)

 

Best Cinematography

Guillaume Deffontaines (Slack Bay)

Jean-Francois Hensgens (After Love)

Elemér Ragályl (1945)

Mikhail Krichman (Loveless)

Rainer Klausmann (In the Fade)

Production Design

Michel Barthélémy (Frantz)

Riton Dupire-Clément (Slack Bay)

Benedikt Herforth, Thomas Stammer (13 Minutes)

Juraj Fabry (The Teacher)

László Rajk (1945)

Costume Design

Pascaline Chavanne (Frantz)

Alexandra Charles (Slack Bay)

Katarzyna Lewinska (Afterimage)

Dorota Roqueplo (Loving Vincent)

Sosa Juristovszky (1945)

Best Music

Uncredited (Personal Shopper)

Philippe Rombi (Frantz)

Andrzej Panufnik (Afterimage)

Tibor Szemzö (1945)

Jeff and Mychael Dana (The Breadwinner) 

Best Original Song

The Crown Sleeps—Music by Qais Essar, lyrics by Joshua Hill; performed by Qais Essar featuring Elaha Soroor and Felicity Williams (The Breadwinner)

Runner-up: I Know Places—Composed by Rick Nowels & Björn Yttling, performed by Lykke Li (In the Fade)

Breakthrough Actor

Brandon Lavieville (Slack Bay) 

Breakthrough Actress

Raph (Slack Bay)

Best Ensemble

Frantz

Slack Bay

Loving Vincent

1945

The Breadwinner

 

Special Citations for Creative Filmmaking

Dorota Kobiela, Hugh Welchman (Loving Vincent)

Nora Twomey (The Breadwinner)

Special Citation for Filmmaking Merit

Oliver Hirschbiegel (Director, 13 Minutes)

Repertory Screening of the Year

Stalker (1979)—New 2K Digital Restoration, Laemmle Royal, West Los Angeles, May 19-June 1

Top Ten International/Foreign Language Films of the Year (in order)

Afterimage; 1945; In the Fade; Personal Shopper; Slack Bay;

The Breadwinner; Loving Vincent; After Love; Past Life; Frantz

© 2018 John Tyler/24 Hours

Me Too: 2017 Film Award Favorites—Domestic/English Language—Prologue

Just when you were totally burnt on 2017 end-of-year film awards, here comes another. I typically time this annual rite to coincide with the Oscars—while also allowing myself time to catch up on all the late-season releases—of which I drastically diverge. This year, instead of being a preview, then, it’s more a post-view, or postmortem; no 11th hour here, we are beyond midnight, sweeping up the dark, deserted celluloid streets as if broken glass by a lone, resolute janitor. The year began slowly, with even foreign fare being atypically underwhelming, but the second half was strong, and I ended with solid top ten lists for both domestic (this time) and foreign (next time) releases.

In terms of the Oscars, this year was no different. Besides the typical snubs—no Will Smith #oscarssowhite uproar this time—the biggest shock IMO was Daniel Kaluuya’s ascension to the summit of acting accomplishment. The young man was, indeed, solid in Get Out and certainly has a promising career—he’s already distinguished himself this year in The Black Panther, a showcase of Black acting talent—but his presence among the likes of Daniel Day-Lewis—an actor in his own category—and Gary Oldman—was a blow to the senses. Not only did it come at the expense of a career-defining, precision performance by Liam Neeson in Mark Felt: The Man Who Brought Down the White House, but the young Brit had to run through a gauntlet of individual accomplishment by many of the best actors we have today who were also in contention: Charlie Zunnan (The Lost City of Z), Brad Pitt (War Machine), Colin Farrell (The Beguiled), Jeremy Renner (Wind River), Hugh Bonneville (Viceroy’s House), Javier Bardem (mother!), Ryan Gosling (Blade Runner 2049), Kenneth Branagh (Murder On the Orient Express), Christian Bale (The Promise, Hostiles), and Tom Hanks (The Post), as well as fellow 28-year-old compatriot Nicholas Hoult (Rebel In the Rye). Now, what unites these fine actors besides prodigious talent is that, with the possible exception of Spaniard Bardem, they are all porcelain Eurocentric, in other words, passé. No, in a year in which Kathryn Bigelow’s Detroit was a disappointment and The Black Panther’s Chadwick Boseman appeared as a young Thurgood Marshall, it was the throwback satiric horror-thriller Get Out, in which writer-director-producer Jordan Peele largely updated Blaxploitation archetypes for a post-Obama nation awash in extrajudicial killings, the mass incarceration of Black peoples, Black voter suppression, and backlash against silent and dignified anthem protests, that captured audiences. Problem is, while the film was undeniably entertaining, well-acted, and wryly subversive, IMO it was not even the most rewarding among its genre, which I believe belonged to M. Night Shyamalan’s even more transformative Split that featured the flat-out most brilliant acting performance of the year by James McAvoy, who was nowhere to be seen come nomination time.

With Kaluyaa’s pick, the Academy achieved a 20% diversity rate among its nominations in the four acting categories in a year in which the profession become more alighted to issues of gender exploitation. That bested my paltry 15%, which was nonetheless better than our sitting president’s 6% in appointing federal judges, though that number is skewed by ideology—it’s difficult to find judges who will suppress people of color who are also persons of color, after all, though not impossible. But before you believe me forcibly retired like those old caucasian former Academy guys, my percentage could’ve improved had I not missed Denzel Washington as Roman J. Israel, Esq.; Crown Heights, which was in theatres for maybe a week or two; or not put off Mudbound for so long that it remains unseen—yes, you may have me stoned or drawn and quartered for that, please do. I did get in scene-stealing supporting actor Idris Elba, again dissed by the Academy, who asserted some of the most stirring monologues on justice or lack thereof in Molly’s Game since Tom Wilkinson in The Conspirator. I also tried to attend an October Beverly Hills special screening of Tariq Nasheed’s (Hidden Colors) 1804: the Hidden History of Haiti, only to be rebuffed by a phalanx of predominately Black theatregoers who had beat me to the punch by buying tickets in advance and who eyed me warily as I espied gaining admittance to the sold-out event. Who knew there’d be an audience?

Speaking of diversity and Molly’s Game, and in a year in which Tom Hanks was not nominated for his solid impersonation of old-school Washington Post newsman Ben Bradlee, the Academy appeared to mail it in on a few. The popular Octavia Spencer, bless her heart, who had been nominated twice—winning once— in the supporting actress category, was nominated again for the excellent The Shape of Water. The Montgomery, Alabama, native could’ve performed blindfolded in the role—she was not challenged at all—and I fear she’s too often being cast as the supportive, inspiring best friend. Bless the next filmmaker who casts her in a role she can get into fourth or fifth gear with in order to show off her true dramatic skills—and receive a truly deserved nomination with. Meanwhile, screenwriter Aaron Sorkin, who puts the “A” into the A-list, assumed the director’s chair in the rather disappointing Molly’s Game because he couldn’t find a director he was satisfied with to visually translate his work. Turns out, the screenplay was the problem the whole time; he was nominated nonetheless. Sorkin’s teaming with Jessica Chastain was so inspired following their turns in, and on, Miss Sloane and Steve Jobs, respectively, I hadn’t been anticipating at all that I would be let down. I had penciled in Chastain for a Performance of the Year award before I’d even sat down to view it. Would I give it to her—for a third consecutive year—with a star turn in the early The Zookeeper’s Wife?

My own nominations in the category were perhaps skewed because I missed Kate Blanchett assuming a number of different disguises in the very limited release, Manifesto, and Kate Winslet in Wonder Wheel, the first Woody Allen film I’ve missed theatrically since Everyone Says I Love You two decades ago. The wonderful Gal Gadot was so acclaimed she did everything but receive a nomination for Wonder Woman, but I preferred the kickass Charlize Theron in the creative spy-thriller Atomic Blonde and reserved a spot for her. While Wonder Woman was bogged down by a neverending climactic digital duel between the heroine and nemesis Sir Patrick (David Thewlis), so dark and atrocious it seemed to nullify all the uplifting female empowerment that came before it, Atomic Blonde featured some of the most breathless real-time fight sequences ever filmed and in which Theron excelled. Both films subverted genres by portraying heroines, but let’s not forget, Wonder Woman may not have been even the most rewarding film about the liberated character herself. That would belong to, IMO, Professor Marston & the Wonder Women, an interior drama portraying scandalous psychology professor William Marston’s (a solid Luke Evans) impassioned efforts to bypass censors to get a slyly subversive comic-book creature into the homes of proper postwar Americans. In a year celebrating women, their contributions, slights, and their miseries, then, it was a seminaked pseudodominatrix from the fantastical mind of a depraved male psychologist who alit the spirits of women throughout.

Fine actress Saoirse Ronan was nominated in the lead actress category for the everpresent Lady Bird, but that celebrated film may not have even been the most rewarding among coming-of-age sagas nor even establishing the best performance by a more mature young actress inhabiting the role of a teenager experiencing troubles with her mother. That would belong, IMO, to In Search of Fellini and diminutive 30-year-old Canadian actress Ksenia Solo, a near dead ringer for Ronan. Due to its title, which rings like a B&W documentary narrated by the late Marcello Mastroianni, American audiences may’ve thought the domestic production was a foreign one, or that, like the heroine’s mother (Maria Bello) and aunt (Mary Lynn Rajskub), were turned off by the maestro’s music. This was not the case for Solo’s naïve Lucy, who rides Fellini’s muse through dirt and daydream all the way to Rome, where she discovers that the sweetest smile arrives only through darkness, disappointment, and despair. Her character’s magical journey in an equally magical film is seemingly a perfect metaphor for the #MeToo and Time’s Up movements and all they encompass, not to give away any spoilers or anything.

In a year in which opportunities for female filmmakers were again bemoaned, Lady Bird writer-director Greta Gerwig was anointed Queen of Hollywood, but what about British filmmaker Gurinder Chada, who turned her own grandmother’s stories of being present at the opulent official residence during the breakup of the Subcontinent into one of the year’s most underappreciated films, Viceroy’s House, and who has taken much vitriol for her interpretation? In a year in which former British PM Winston Churchill was central to at least three feature films, two of which received the Academy’s attention, either remotely or front and center—with Oldman winning an Oscar for portraying him front and center—IMO this was the one to see to get a more precise view of the fellow’s truer nature. Who do you think destroyed India, after all—Hindus, Sikhs, and Muslims?

Allison Janney took home the best supporting actress Oscar for her screeching turn as an abusive sports mother in the fine I, Tonya. While she was impressive, matching wits with a very good Margot Robbie, whose figure-skating skills were nearly as impressive as Theron’s sustained martial-arts bravura, I gauged the performance as too one-noted and over-the-top and ultimately excised her from my own nominations list. Would Leslie Manville, who would’ve owned Phantom Thread if she were not opposite Day-Lewis, with a sharply stern and less expressive performance I judged to be superior?

Oscar-caliber films are often thought to penetrate the time in which they are made. Several Best Picture nominees looked to the past to accomplish that, including Academy nominee The Post. The Steven Spielberg–helmed, John Williams–scored Oscar aspirant hit its target directly, but in a more sentimental way than Mark Felt, which was scrappier, grittier, tenser—in part due to its pulsing neonoir Daniel Pemberton (All the Money in the World, Molly’s Game) score—and, IMO, superior. …Felt actually picks up where The Post leaves off, from the Iraq-like suppression of compromising Vietnam War documents to presidential-level hijinks at Democratic National Committee headquarters, an event The Post actually alludes to as if hinting at a sequel. Both, however, are, of course, not-so-subtle digs at the current White House, which recalls the Nixon occupation in so many ways.

Another film dissed by the Academy was Hostiles. EW’s Chris Nashawaty, who’s no slouch, called it, “the best western since Unforgiven,” a quote that easily comes into one’s own mind after viewing it, though I would say Dead Man instead of Unforgiven. Unforgiven earned nine Oscar nominations, taking home four statuettes, including one for Best Picture, so what gives? Hostiles, based on a manuscript by Oscar-winning screenwriter Donald Stewart (Missing), also looked to the past, namely the Indian Wars of the late 19th century, and by performing open surgery on the very heart and soul of those troubling times it not only punctuates the western, but transforms the genre entirely, arriving somehow as a metaphor for our own troubled, divisive times. From genocide to reconciliation, it’s no wonder Nashawaty also described it as “brutal and beautiful.”

Those words can also describe another film that flirts with Best Picture qualities: Blade Runner 2049. The much-anticipated film didn’t actually disappoint, not in terms of casting, dialog, performances, scenarios, production design, visual effects, etc., but it was weighted down by a way-too-sentimental take on the aged character of Decker (Harrison Ford) that created tonal imbalance at a crucial time, though the film recovered via a nice extended shoreline fight sequence and a stunning, devastating finale. The film surprised me by sweeping through my awards list, and rising up the ranks of the top ten. Would it reach the top? Beauty is, after all, in the eye of the beholder, and this, in 2017, is what I beheld.

(This post continues below.)

© 2018 John Tyler/24 Hours

Me Too: 2017 Film Award Favorites—Domestic/English Language—Awards

Domestic/English Language Film Awards

(Winners in bold.) 

Film of the Year

Rebel In the Rye

In Search of Fellini

Mark Felt: The Man Who Brought Down the White House

The Shape of Water

Hostiles

Filmmaker of the Year (Writer-Director)

James Gray (The Lost City of Z)

Darren Aronofsky (mother!)

Guillermo del Toro (The Shape of Water)

Scott Cooper (Hostiles)

Paul Thomas Anderson (Phantom Thread) 

Stand-Alone Director of the Year

Denis Villeneuve (Blade Runner 2049) 

Best Screenplay

Nancy Cartwright, Peter Kjenaas (In Search of Fellini)

Hampton Fincher, Michael Green* (Blade Runner 2049)

(*based on characters by Philip K. Dick)

Yorgos Lanthimos, Efthymis Filippou (The Killing of a Sacred Deer)

Guillermo del Toro, Vanessa Taylor (The Shape of Water)

Liz Hannah, Josh Singer (The Post)

Best Adapted Screenplay

Angela Workman (The Zookeeper’s Wife)

James Gray (The Lost City of Z)

Danny Strong (Rebel In the Rye)

Peter Landesman (Mark Felt: The Man Who Brought Down the White House)

Scott Cooper (Hostiles) 

Daniel Day-Lewis Male Performance of the Year Award

Daniel Day-Lewis (Phantom Thread) 

Male Performance of the Year—The Others

James McAvoy (Split)

Charlie Zunnan (The Lost City of Z)

Liam Neeson (Mark Felt: The Man Who Brought Down the White House)

Ryan Gosling (Blade Runner 2049)

Christian Bale (Hostiles) 

Female Performance of the Year

Jessica Chastain (The Zookeeper’s Wife)

Charlize Theron (Atomic Blonde)

Ksenia Solo (In Search of Fellini)

Rosamund Pike (Hostiles)

Meryl Streep (The Post)

William Powell—Myrna Loy Onscreen Chemistry Award

Tom Hanks—Meryl Streep (The Post)

Male Supporting Performance 

Michael Fassbender (Song to Song)

Graham Greene (Wind River)

Benny Safdie (Good Time)

Willem Dafoe (The Florida Project)

Idris Elba (Molly’s Game)

Female Supporting Performance 

Sienna Miller (The Lost City of Z)

Huma Kureshi (Viceroy’s House)

Sarah Pauley (Rebel In the Rye/The Post)

Michelle Pfeiffer (mother!/Murder On the Orient Express)

Lesley Manville (Phantom Thread) 

Best Cinematography

Darius Khondji (The Lost City of Z)

Ben Richardson (Wind River)

Roger Deakens (Blade Runner 2049)

Dan Laustsen (The Shape of Water)

Masanobu Takayanagi (Hostiles)

Production Design

Phillip Messina (mother!)

Dennis Gasner (Blade Runner 2049)

Jim Clay (Murder On the Orient Express)

Paul Austerberry (The Shape of Water)

Mark Tildesley (Phantom Thread)

Costume Design 

Stacey Battatt (The Beguiled)

Cindy Evans (Atomic Blonde)

Donna Maloney (Professor Marston & the Wonder Women)

Luis Sequeira (The Shape of Water)

Mark Bridges (Phantom Thread)

Best Music

Tyler Bates (Atomic Blonde)

David Campbell (In Search of Fellini)

Daniel Pemberton (Mark Felt: The Man Who Brought Down the White House)

Benjamin Wallfisch, Hans Zimmer (Blade Runner 2049)

Max Richter (Hostiles)

Best Original Song

99 Luftballons—Composed by Joern Fahrenkrog-Petersen & Carlo Karges, performed by Kaleida (Atomic Blonde)

Breakthrough Actor

Ross Lynch (My Friend Dahmer) 

Breakthrough Actress

Jessica Sula (Split/The Lovers)

Best Ensemble

Song to Song

Viceroy’s House

Blade Runner 2049

Murder On the Orient Express

The Post

Special Citations for Creative Filmmaking

Jordan Peele (Get Out)

Joachim Rønning, Espen Sandberg (Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales)

David Leitsch (Atomic Blonde)

Benny & Josh Safdie (Good Time)

Special Citation for Filmmaking Merit (Writer-Director-Producer)

M. Night Shyamalan (Split)

Repertory Screening of the Year

Maurice (1987) 30th Anniversary 4K Restoration (Landmark Nuart, West Los Angeles, June 2-8)

Runner Up: Heat and Dust (1983) 4K Restoration (Laemmle Royal, West Los Angeles, September 1-14

Charles Chaplin Award (RIP) 

Harvey W

James Toback

Kevin Spacey

Brett Ratner

Louis C.K.

Bryan Singer

Top Ten Domestic/English Language Films of the Year (in order)

Hostiles; Blade Runner 2049; Mark Felt: The Man Who Brought Down the White House; In Search of Fellini; The Shape of Water; Rebel In the Rye; The Lost City of Z; The Post; Phantom Thread; Viceroy’s House

© 2018 John Tyler/24 Hours

Out of the Lights

I 24 Hours

From the architectural wonders to the synthetic cities, from New York to Paris to Venice, from Coney Island to the Eiffel Tower to the Venice Canals, from Flamingo to Tropicana to the Strip, it has never seemed a more suitable time for this desert city to go to sleep. From the blue-lit clubs to the purple lounges to the sun-kissed cabanas, from the candelabra to the glittering stars to the spraying fountains, from the 1800 Silver Tequila to the peach schnapps to the Fernet-Branca, if only for 24 hours. But the city that never sleeps, never does.

A microcosm of America, to be sure, at the most opportune time. Dim-lit bars, discarded adult invitations, refuse-strewn pavements. Shooting and hunting conventions, combat arms expositions, discount firearm and ammunition bazaars. Indoor shooting ranges.

The sustained fusillade that swept the southern Strip last Sunday evening defied some of the justification that those advocates of unbridled access to M&P-style armaments and ammunitions to the typical American citizen under some recent hallowed interpretation of the Second Amendment of our Constitution, one being that the perpetrator presently appears to be just such a person—a lone aficionado of the art and science of the civilian soldier of fortune—and not some deranged kid with braces and a pock-marked face with bangs to his nose who’d narrowly been saved from a stay at a mental hospital by a protective mother and had subsequently fallen off his meds under her delinquent supervision. No, this shooting was straight out of the arms-enthusiast playbook: some 23 armaments onsite and another 24 or so strewn across two locations and purchased across four states, with 33 coming in the last 12 months; some 14 semi-automatic rifles onsite had legitimate rapid-trigger stock modifications to the tune of hundreds of rounds per minute; .308-caliber conventional rifles; .223-caliber AR-15s; an AK-47; high-capacity magazines; magnification scopes; EOTech holographic sights; forward hand grips; surveillance cameras. A weekend warrior’s wet dream, the arsenal made the mobilized Las Vegas PD look like the Boy Scouts. An officer was hunched a ground floor below the assassin’s 32nd floor for nine minutes before another identified his room on the floor above; nobody moved until tactical units arrived 24 minutes later, and it was another 33 minutes before the door to the room was blown open.

Although we’ve moved disarmingly forward from the mass-produced prime-and-load Springfield Flintlock in use when the amendment was conceived to sanction well-constituted state militias, it’s never a good time to talk gun and purchase restrictions or an assault-weapons and high-capacity magazine ban; we’re told especially not now, so we won’t. Besides, James Brady is dead, buried, and forgotten. Suffice is to say we live under a federal government that is currently much more interested in boasting about search and rescue operations and pointing to the virtues of our first responders than in forestalling the actual events from occurring themselves. We’re just here, then, for a little show and tell. After all, it was all legally procured.

II Show / Tell

At Daniel Defense, I “satisfied my taste” for a DD custom-built M4 rifle—four of which were found in the shooter’s hotel room—by using its custom web “virtual” tool to build an AR-style rifle with the components I was “most passionate about.” I thought maybe there’d be a statement from Mr. Daniel, the armorer himself, about the tragic barrage greeting visitors on his homepage, but no, just a selection of sleek, expensive semiautomatic riles and quality components for sale for connoisseurs like myself. Oh well, I chose a black finish with the DD Tornado furniture color instead of the popular mil-spec+brown, a cost-effective Geissele SSA 2-stage trigger, a 5.56 NATO mid-length gas system for softer felt recoil, a lightweight-profile midlength 1.7 twist standard military 14.5” CHF barrel, a Gemtech carbon-cutting flash hider with pinned extender, a 5.56 complete bolt carrier group, an aluminum 12.0 SLiM rail for “incredible” weight savings, a streamlined A1.5 fixed rear sight, a textured Tornado vertical grip for a full positive handle, and an Aimpoint micro mount with absolute cowitness. I’ll have the precision gunsmithed and engraved M4 shipped from DD’s state-of-the-art Black Creek, Georgia, facility within seven days to my FFL dealer due south of the Strip—although Discount Firearms+Ammo is an awesome shop!—instead of to my California one to avoid the magazine restrictions, and my 2017 federal tax return can more than take care of the $2035.80 price, which includes federal tax + $19.95 shipping. In fact, my return can cover another I covet.

As an addition to my FN America FN 15 16” 5.56 NATO matte-black M4 Collector Carbine with 30 Rd. capacity and pistol grip—similar to three also discovered in room 135—I’m looking at the Sig Sauer—another elite brand favored by the shooter—SIG516 5.56 NATO with “unmatched” reliability and function and adjustable gas valve for “adverse conditions.” I’m going to pick one up at Henderson Defense Industries Lock N Load Tactical due south of McCarron International just beyond the I-215. It’ll be worth the taxi ride down because I’m going to save $190 at Lock N Load’s $1604.62 base price. Add in a few ProMag 30-round high-capacity clips for the desert and a few Ruger 5-round detachables for Cali and that’ll just about do it. I’ve already spent my state return on my auto insurance, but who drives in Vegas?

FN15M42m4a1_msp_l_02-088-15126-0112SI516G216P

III Vive La Vie

After taking the ramp underneath the Coney Island Roller Coaster and down past the Statue of Liberty, I like to start the morning with a stroll through the damp boulevards of New York New York, then across the walkway toward the MGM Grand and down the Boulevard under the Montgolfier Balloon and into the neoclassical Beau-Arts façade to a seat at Le Café ile St. Louis for a Parisian breakfast—just love the lucid open-air ambiance there!—then a stopover at one of the pretty deserted midmorning tables for Blackjack and then Five-Card Draw—no Three-Card Poker for me! From there, I’ll walk out under the massive frame of the Eiffel Tower and cross the Boulevard high toward Flamingo Road then into the Bellagio’s glitzy glass enchantment, past Gucci, Louis Vuitton, Prada, Dior, Tiffany & Co, Chanel, and Georgio Armani, just past the Boulevard Shops to the Bellagio Gallery of Fine Art, then just next door to Café Gelato. Quitting the glass enchantment, gelato in hand, I’ll then step inside a taxi—no Uber for me!—for a midafternoon excursion up the Strip and across I-15 to MGV, where I’ll warm up with a Glock 17 9x19mm, Colt M4 Commando, and H & K MP5 submachine gun in the Urban Assault Experience, adding in an FN Herstal 5.56 M249 Light Machine Gun just like our guys in Afghanistan; then, after really getting the blood moving and laughing at the afterthought of the gelato, I won’t resist assuming a KRISS Vector from one of the girls and tear up a target or two—can’t get enough of that cool asymmetrical recoil—Damn! Shaken, stirred, euphoric, I’m in line for a short ride back down toward Flamingo to Rio, where the shade in the ornate carport is always welcome. Then, it’s into the lobby, past the chill modern ambiance of iBar Ultra Lounge and into the booming, smoky Masquerade Village, past the bar and up the high-speed glass Tower Elevator with its vertiginous view of the backside of the west-side Strip to the 51st floor for a rooftop cocktail or two, a Giant Tiger Prawns appetizer, and some conversation at Voodoo after cleaning myself up a bit.

From Rio, I’ll take a shuttle over to Harrah’s, then walk down the Boulevard past Madame Tussauds and into the sun-drenched vista of the Venetian, past the placid pools and the Gondalas and into the casino to check out the cocktail waitresses—absolutely the very best outfits in town! Then it’s out and across the pedestrian bridge to Treasure Island as the shadows deepen and the sun finally disappears behind the immense folding structure of the hotel above, into Sirens’ Cove before the fronds, through the casino to the tram to the adjacent Mirage, where it’s then through the domed, leafy atrium and an immediate right—nice to not have to walk through a casino to get somewhere!—for a quiet dinner of General Tso’s Chicken or Mongolian Beef and an imported beer at FIN. From there, it’s back on the tram to TI for the 9:30 showing of Mystère—I can never see it enough and anyway still prefer it to the new stuff, which make me a little uncomfortable. Waiting for the show to start, sitting on an aisle, I’ll seemingly still feel the vibration of the Kriss Special V in my hands. Afterward, after exchanging knowing glances with a brunet perhaps with a small coterie of girlfriends, I’ll step into the Mystère Store to see if they have anything from Dead Men Tell No Tales—I’ve seen it twice—then, with a short Decaf Americano from the adjacent Starbucks in hand, I’ll meet the cool night air inspired by the breathtaking acrobatics and artistic aspirations once again. I will actually have been thinking about a cab—even an Uber or a Lyft!—somewhat stiff and worn from the day’s endeavors, but now a moonlit stroll back up the Boulevard will be definitely in order. Strewn now with discarded invitations, promotions, discounts, and detritus, I’ll make my way past the frolicking Fountains once again, with the ghastly spectre of the lit Bellagio and Caesar’s Palace against the blackened sky. I’ll make it to the walkway on Soleil’s wings, then into the hotel, up an elevator, and down the quietly eerie and deserted, seemingly endless, hallway to the room. Inside, after sitting on the bed for a bit and then brushing my teeth, I’ll likely pass out to some soft-core on one of the adult channels, because, you know, it’s Vegas and all that, and I don’t stay out all night, though it’ll be CNN when I awake the following morning.

If I didn’t happen to see ya, you know, maybe tomorrow, down past the Flamingo in The Linq Promenade in line at Gordon Ramsey Fish & Chips. I should be over there at about four or so. Join me for a Biscoff Shake or just an imported or craft beer. Until then, Vive la vie!

slide-11

 

 

bellagio-hotel-fountains-at-night-merridy-jeffery

© 2017 John Tyler/24 Hours